Transitional Fossils: Archaeopteryx, Dinosaur-Bird Evolution and Creationism

Transitional Fossils: Archaeopteryx, Dinosaur-Bird Evolution and Creationism

Charles Darwin predicted that the fossil record would revealtransitional fossils, showing intermediate features between the different types if animals.  If everything evolved from ‘lower’ orders, then we should indeed find fossils that show traits of both modern and ancestral (ie if birds evolved from reptiles, we should find birds with reptilian features, and/or reptiles with avian features) forms.  Worth noting of course, is that such a finding would seriously contradict the Biblical notion of the contemporaneously “created kinds.” Because of this, existence of transitional fossils has become probably the biggest target of anti-evolution propaganda.

Nothing epitomizes the unethical treatment and utter abuse of painstaking scientific research and publication by the anti-evolution movement like their incessant claim that transitional fossils do not exist. These arguments range from playing on semantics, ignoring important discoveries, cherry-picking scientific literature, and quote mines (you’re not surprised are you?).

Rather than try and list every instance of transitional fossils (see list here), I will focus on the reptile-avian relationship, and expose the laundry list of straw man arguments employed by the evolution-denier movement.

Transitional fossils

It’s important to note what we mean by transitional fossils.  In general, it’s a fossil that shows traits of two types (evolution deniers are generally vague about the meaning of ‘types,’ for the point of this blog, we’ll use it synonymously with orders) of animals, as though it were an intermediate between the two.   Continue reading

Posted in Transitional Fossils | Leave a comment

The First Americans and the Extinction of the Mammoths (and other Megafauna)

The First Americans and the Extinction of the Mammoths  (and other Megafauna)


The end of the Pleistocene marks the end of the last ice age and is accompanied by the extinction of several large fauna. Perhaps the most noticeable of these happened in North America. This also marks the migration of man from Eastern Asia into North America. The existence of kill sites, as well as the contemporaneousness of man’s arrival into the Americas and the disappearance of large fauna, has led some researchers to conclude that these Paleoindians hunted large megafauna to extinction, in what’s known as the Overkill or Blitzkrieg hypothesis.

Continue reading

Posted in Human Evolution | Leave a comment

Evolution Facts: The Cambrian Explosion & Fossil Record

A common but inaccurate  portrayal of Creation ‘scientists’ appears to be that of a group of ignorant hillbillies who are taken serious by no one.   This leaves many people wondering how any one, in this day and age, can deny the fact of evolution.

In reality, creation scientists are masters of persuasive speaking or writing and fool well-meaning Christians with their superficially impressive arguments.  Sure, some of us simply roll our eyes and recognize Kent Hovind as a sneaky underhanded snake oil salesman as he spouts his misinformation at seemingly hypersonic speeds, but there are those who don’t so readily see through such nonsense.  And beyond this, there are those who do recognize an outlandish person like Hovind for what he is but simply believe he is over the top, whereas comparatively honest creationist sources like Answers in Genesis are closer to the truth.

Anti-evolutionists compartmentalize evolution into a non-reality, with 2 basic components; Continue reading

Posted in Evolution vs Creationism | Leave a comment

Not all Erecti are Equal: Debunking another Straw Man

There are a couple of commonly held misconceptions creationists have used to confuse people regarding the hominid fossil record, and a recent article has been written around these points in order to push anti-evolution propaganda.

1-Homo habilis and Homo erectus lived alongside one another, proving that the later could not have evolved from the former, and therefore disrupting if not disproving the notion that the hominid line displays human ancestry 

2-The discovery of a 10 MYO gorilla shows places the ape-human split into a timeframe where primate ancestry becomes impossible (or at least, improbable).

I will explain them here

1-Homo habilis and Homo erectus lived alongside one another…

“First, as reported on August 9, two alleged ancestors of man, Homo erectus and Homo habilis, were found to be living together about 1.5 million years ago (MYA). This is a big deal because Erectus was supposed to have evolved from Habilis before later evolving into Sapiens (us).”

First, let’s start with what makes the hominid line extraordinary, and why we know these are our ancestors. We find a gradation from “upright ape” (Austrolepethecus afarensis) to anatomically modern humans.  These transitions include brain size (from 420cc (similar to a chimpanzee) to 1350cc (modern human)) jaw protrusion, arm/leg length, the existence then disappearance of a sagittal crest, complexity of stone tools, etc.  The more anatomically modern human the attributes, the more recent they happen to have existed.  The fossils we find are a small and partial collection of what actually existed, so the idea that we need to know which of these are ancestral to us and which are side branches is simply mistaken. Continue reading

Posted in Human Evolution | Leave a comment

Suggested Reading: Living with Darwin

So I finally got a copy of Phillip Kitcher’s new book,Living With Darwin: Evolution, Design, and the Future of Faith.  I had been eagerly anticipating this book and not surprisingly, I finished it within 2 days of starting it. Not only did I learn several new facets of Evolution, but thanks to Kitcher’s well-articulated methodical dissection of the various sciences that reinforce Evolution while falsifying it’s “rivals,” I have learned how to better articulate what I already knew.

Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Kirk Cameron on Evolution

In a recent debate on ABC, Kirk Cameron made several false claims regarding evolution which ignore some basics on Paleontology and Taxonomy (2 subjects that are central to an understanding of evolution).  These arguments are typical of the straw man arguments and quote mines; Micro vs, Macro Evolution, the ‘lack of transitional fossils,’ the types of intermediates creationists claim ’should’ exist, DNA is a message from God, etc.  For this reason, it’s a perfect opportunity to illustrate how creationists distort (or even omit) some basic facts in order to confuse people on evolution.

Watch most of the debate here.

Claim 1: Evolution starts with nothing, then an explosion (Big Bang) produces everything over billions of years.

Kirk is using arguments from ignorance to ‘disprove evolution’ (ie “The origins of the universe are still a mystery, therefore Evolution is false”).  Evolution explains how current life evolved from lower orders, not how the universe began (the study of the universe’s origins is a different field of study altogether). The origins of life, as Brian Sapient pointed out, is known as Abiogenesis, which is a much newer field of study, still very much in its infancy. Continue reading

Posted in Evolution vs Creation Debate | Leave a comment

The Fossil Record proves we are African Apes

 

History of Man

hominid-evolution-missing-links

SPECIES TIME PERIOD
Ardipithicus ramidus 5 to 4 million years ago
Australopithecus anamensis 4.2 to 3.9 million years ago
Australopithecus afarensis 4 to 2.7 million years ago
Australopithecus africanus (B & C) 3 to 2 million years ago
Australopithecus robustus 2.2 to 1.6 million years ago
Homo habilis (D & E) 2.2 to 1.6 million years ago
Homo erectus (G) 2.0 to 0.4 million years ago
Homo sapiens archaic 400 to 200 thousand years ago
Homo sapiens neandertalensis (J-L) 200 to 30 thousand years ago
Homo sapiens sapiens (N) 200 thousand years ago to present

The times of existence of the various hominid shown in the chart above are based on dated fossil remains. Each species may have existed earlier and/or later than shown, but fossil proof has not been discovered yet. There is also dispute concerning many overlapping species, for example, the overlap between Homo habilis and Homo erectus. It could well be that the two are continuing examples of the same species. The same dispute exists withHomo erectusHomo sapiens archaic and homo sapiens sapiens. If all species have been discovered and the lineage of man lies within them, the most probable lineage would include all but the robust Australopithecines and the neandertal.

The following chronology is abbreviated:

The earliest fossil hominid, Ardipithecus ramidus, is a recent discovery. It is dated at 4.4 million years ago. The remains are incomplete but enough is available to suggest it was bipedal and about 4 feet tall. Other fossils were found with the ramidus fossil which would suggest that ramidus was a forest dweller. A new skeleton was recently discovered which is about 45% complete. It is now being studied.

A new species, Australopithecus anamensis, was named in 1995. It was found in Allia Bay in Kenya. Anamensis lived between 4.2 and 3.9 million years ago. Its body showed advanced bipedal features, but the skull closely resembled the ancient apes.

Australopithecus afarensis lived between 3.9 and 3.0 million years ago. It retained the apelike face with a sloping forehead, a distinct ridge over the eyes, flat nose and a chinless lower jaw. It had a brain capacity of about 450 cc. It was between 3’6″ and 5′ tall. It was fully bipedal and the thickness of its bones showed that it was quite strong. Its build (ratio of weight to height) was about the same as the modern human but its head and face were proportionately much larger. This larger head with powerful jaws is a feature of all species prior to Homo sapiens sapiens.

Australopithecus africanus was quite similar to afarensis and lived between three and two million years ago. It was also bipedal, but was slightly larger in body size. Its brain size was also slightly larger, ranging up to 500 cc. The brain was not advanced enough for speech. The molars were a little larger than in afarensis and much larger than modern human. This hominid was a herbivore and ate tough, hard to chew, plants. The shape of the jaw was now like the human.

Australopithecus aethiopicus lived between 2.6 and 2.3 million years ago. This species is probably an ancestor of the robustus and boisei. This hominid ate a rough and hard to chew diet. He had huge molars and jaws and a large sagittal crest. A sagittal crest is a bony ridge on the skull extending from the forehead to the back of the head. Massive chewing muscles were anchored to this crest. See the opening picture of an early Homo habilis for an example. Brain sizes were still about 500cc, with no indication of speech functions.

Australopithecus robustus lived between two and 1.5 million years ago. It had a body similar to that of africanus, but a larger and more massive skull and teeth. Its huge face was flat and with no forehead. It had large brow ridges and a sagittal crest. Brain size was up to 525cc with no indication of speech capability.

Australopithecus boisei lived between 2.1 and 1.1 million years ago. It was quite similar torobustus, but with an even more massive face. It had huge molars, the larger measuring 0.9 inches across. The brain size was about the same as robustus. Some authorities believe that robustus and boisei are variants of the same species.

Homo habilis was called the handy man because tools were found with his fossil remains. This species existed between 2.4 and 1.5 million years ago. The brain size in earlier fossil specimens was about 500cc but rose to 800cc toward the end of the species life period. The species brain shape shows evidence that some speech had developed. Habilis was about 5′ tall and weighed about 100 pounds. Some scientists believe that habilis is not a separate species and should be carried either as a later Australopithecine or an early Homo erectus. It is possible that early examples are in one species group and later examples in the other.

Homo erectus lived between 1.8 million and 300,000 years ago. It was a successful species for a million and a half years. Early examples had a 900cc brain size on the average. The brain grew steadily during its reign. Toward the end its brain was almost the same size as modern man, at about 1200cc. The species definitely had speech. Erectus developed tools, weapons and fire and learned to cook his food. He traveled out of Africa into China and Southeast Asia and developed clothing for northern climates. He turned to hunting for his food. Only his head and face differed from modern man. Like habilis, the face had massive jaws with huge molars, no chin, thick brow ridges, and a long low skull. Though proportioned the same, he was sturdier in build and much stronger than the modern human.

Homo sapiens (archaic) provides the bridge between erectus and Homo sapiens sapiensduring the period 200,000 to 500,000 years ago. Many skulls have been found with features intermediate between the two. Brain averaged about 1200cc and speech was indicated. Skulls are more rounded and with smaller features. Molars and brow ridges are smaller. The skeleton shows a stronger build than modern human but was well proportioned.

Homo sapiens neandertalensis lived in Europe and the Mideast between 150,000 and 35,000 years ago. Neandertals coexisted with H.sapiens (archaic) and early H.sapiens sapiens. It is not known whether he was of the same species and disappeared into theH.sapiens sapiens gene pool or he may have been crowded out of existence (killed off) by the H.sapien sapien. Recent DNA studies have indicated that the neandertal was an entirely different species and did not merge into the H. sapiens sapiens gene pool. Brain sizes averaged larger than modern man at about 1450cc but the head was shaped differently, being longer and lower than modern man. His nose was large and was different from modern man in structure. He was a massive man at about 5’6″ tall with an extremely heavy skeleton that showed attachments for massive muscles. He was far stronger than modern man. His jaw was massive and he had a receding forehead, like erectus.

Homo sapiens sapiens first appeared about 120,000 years ago. Modern humans have an average brain size of about 1350 cc.

http://www.onelife.com/evolve/manev.html

Posted in Human Evolution | Leave a comment

Debate with Dr. Jackson: Post-Debate Comments

In 2007, some creationist friends of mine organized a debate between creation scientist Dr. Jackson and myself.  The links below link to specific portions of the debate.  Below this are my post-debate facts.

I believe my debate with Dr. Jackson highlighted many of the claims I’ve made over creationism’s existence not a science but rather a series of arguments aimed at straw manning the science behind evolution through rhetorical tricks.

So in following up on the last portion of the debate (Q & A):

In regards to Answer 1–The Coccyx as a Vestigial structure whether Dr Jackson likes it or not. Continue reading

Posted in Evolution vs Creation Debate | Leave a comment

Debate with Dr Jackson: Q & A on Evolution

1) In your first rebuttal, you made the below statement; “And there is no model for how nostrils could move gradually through the brain, to the back of the head to make the whale blowhole. Think about it.” Which whale(s) does this apply to and can you provide a diagram that shows the nasal passage moving up along the backside of the brain?

Answer 1)I retract my statement about the whale blowhole. It is not behind the brain.

But Chris, I now wonder if you will retract your statement about the human coccyx. It is not vestigial.

After I corrected you on this, your response was to say:
“Apparently we don’t need a coccyx, given the existence of a Coccygectomy (the surgical removal of the Coccyx).”

This does not make it apparent that we don’t need a coccyx. If it did, then:
“Apparently we don’t need a frontal lobe to the brain, given the existence of a Frontal Lobotomy (the surgical removal of the Frontal Lobe).”

Everyone knows the usefulness of the frontal lobe. And you ought to know the usefulness of the coccyx.
It is the anchor for the muscles of rectum control, childbirth, abdominal organ support, and the lower back. We also need it to sit down.
If I was wrong about whale anatomy, you are wrong about human anatomy. Be honest. We await your retraction. Continue reading

Posted in Evolution vs Creation Debate | Leave a comment

Debate with Dr. Jackson: Questions from both sides

Evolution is a fact asked:

1-In your first rebuttal, you made the below statement;
“And there is no model for how nostrils could move gradually through the brain, to the back of the head to make the whale blowhole. Think about it.”

Which whale(s) does this apply to and can you provide a diagram that shows the nasal passage moving up along the backside of the brain?

2- If hominids are not in fact our ancestors, perhaps you can clear some confusion by educating readers on which are ape and which are human (for reference, Chimpanzees have a brain size of roughly 410 cc, Gorillas 500 cc, and all of the hominids below were bipedal);
Continue reading

Posted in Evolution vs Creation Debate | Leave a comment